top of page

Museum visit: [Re:]Entangling with colonisation

Last week, I had the pleasure of attending the '[Re:]Entanglements' closing party at the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology in Cambridge, marking an end to 10 months of showcasing the colonial collections.


The purpose of this display was not only to educate people, but to provoke thoughts on colonisation and anthropology whilst being politically and emotionally charged by 'Re-engaging with Colonial Archives in Decolonial Times.'


Professor Paul Basu spoke in great detail about the items included in the exhibit, such as photographs, carved wooden figures, household items, masks and pottery. He also gave an honourable mention to the anthropologist who collected many of these artefacts from Southern Nigeria and Sierra Leone between 1909-15, Northcote Whitridge Thompson, the first government appointed anthropologist.


As an African British person, I was initially intrigued by these artefacts so close to my own heritage and culture, having never seen many of them before.


To see the faces of people alike and items that not even my oldest family members posses was heartwarming. I could understand why the work of N. W. Thomas could be regarded so highly.



Although, as enlightening as the showcase was and astonishing the collection of artwork is, the idea of collecting heirlooms for cultural interest was also very questionable to me.


This may be a controversial view, but I questioned whether Thomas has ever been considered as disrespectful toward African culture by having the desire to investigate it and show it to the White man. With this in mind, I also questioned whether colonisers saw this as as an oddity, dime museum, or as an insightful and educational surveillance.


"Whether he had good intention or not, he has opened the door to a discussion that needs to be had."

The collection may be seen as invasive or even discomforting, making the name of the collection inappropriate to some - as 'The Thomas Collection' does not describe the actuality of the artefacts very well, and in fact is misnamed in my opinion.


There is a story behind each photo and artefact, allowing viewers to see beyond the surface and to be stimulated by the depth of emotions behind each item originating from the people.


Despite the fact that Thomas was gifted or bought the items on display, there are varied opinions on the assembly of the collection. Some believe he may not have had good intention, whereas others see his anthropology as a loving approach to an unknown culture.


Regardless, this exhibition was a beautiful display that opens a discussion on West African culture, people, tools, brining a narrative alive and allowing for a deepened discussion of colonisation.


We are re-entangled with colonisation in this exhibit to perceive how such events and monuments in history have weaved communities and cultures together over time.


What is your view on the debate? You can share your views by sharing a comment. Be part of the discussion!


Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, displaying Ukhurhes - an essential ritual object placed on the family altar when an Edo man dies.



Comentários


bottom of page